Key takeaways:

• Time in the market is a conservative investing strategy that emphasises patience and seeks to prioritise sustainable returns over the long-term 

• Timing the market involves greater risk and is suited to short-term opportunities where traders look to capitalise on the fluctuations of a stock, or the market at large

—

It’s an age-old question that has dominated markets for as long as trading became a phenomenon. Is it better to spend time in the market, or instead try to time the market?

On the one hand, the former centres on a long-term outlook, staying invested over an extended period of time, whereas the latter focuses on decisions that seek to pinpoint the highs and lows of the market to maximise returns.

While most market participants tend to fall into one of the two camps, there are even some individuals who believe that both strategies have their place, depending on the gyrations of the market.

For now, however, let’s take a closer look at this timeworn dilemma.

Time in the Market

This is the tried and tested method advocated by successful long-term investors like Warren Buffett and Ken Fisher. Essentially, this strategy embraces a long-term mindset, leveraging the upside of staying fully invested over a long investment horizon.

It discounts the effects of market fluctuations over the short-term, with investors instead prioritising the effects of compounding returns over time, not to mention the general tendency for the market to increase over the long-term.

Why do long-term investors particularly favour time in the market? The biggest advantage of this strategy is that investors refrain from making any rash decisions and allow their portfolios to ride out any market volatility. Investors rely on the fact that the market tends to deliver sustainable returns over the long-term, and patience plays a key role in harnessing that.

There are also some incidental advantages to consider, including but not limited to reduced brokerage fees, greater flexibility with tax planning, as well as more time to spend on other matters outside of following one’s investments.

Read more here about the benefits of a buy-and-hold investment strategy.

Timing the Market

If time in the market is all about a hands-off long-term approach, then timing the market is a starkly different proposition. Put simply, it involves making investment decisions based on expectations regarding the price of a stock. 

The underlying goal of timing the market is to buy when prices are low, and sell when prices are high. As such, the focus here is on the short-term and leveraging fluctuations in the market to take advantage of buying and selling opportunities that offer the potential to outperform.

Naturally, there is an extensive amount of risk with this approach, because as we all know, predicting the market is nigh on impossible. Sure, tools like technical analysis may help, and can certainly lend themselves to correct forecasts, but timing the market is a strategy that depends on consistency. Profits from one ‘correct’ trade can easily be wiped out by a ‘bad’ trade.

On top of that, there is also the fact that a number of matters make it extremely difficult to predict movements in the stock market. Whether it be war, commodity price cycles, economic data, geopolitics, regulatory or policy change, or a host of other macro and even company-specific developments, unexpected hurdles are always in play.

Short-term trading is also heavily swayed by execution, as traders must hold their nerves and prevent any emotional biases impacting their judgement, or prompting them to make a decision that could prove costly. When things do go right, however, the upside of timing the market is that it can offer superior returns, while also protecting capital during a market downturn.

Learn more about the difference between investing and trading.

The Role of Risk and Market Conditions

At the centre of the debate between the two strategies, investors should pay significant attention to their risk appetite. Inherently, trying to time the market involves a heightened degree of risk based on short-term volatility. In contrast, time in the market is considered a more conservative approach founded on the fact that markets tend to increase over time.

But there is also the matter of what’s unfolding in the broader market at the time of making a decision.

During periods where there is market volatility, there may be some consideration in trying to ‘buy the dip’, so to speak. Of course, there is still downside risk, as with any trade, but the upside may be deemed significant in the lens of a risk-return trade-off. Where market conditions are more stable, however, this sort of trade-off may be absent, in which case, sustainable returns might be targeted through time in the market.

As to the answer regarding which strategy is more successful, this largely boils down to the period being analysed. Indeed, over the long-term, with markets typically rising, there is a generally accepted view that time in the market beats timing the market.

However, there have also been periods where timing the market would have been greatly successful and yielded superior returns, albeit much of this comes down to a trader’s skillset and the ability to meticulously execute one’s plan.

Both strategies have their advantages and disadvantages, but ultimately, their effectiveness will depend on an investor’s goals, investment horizon, risk appetite, and the broader conditions of the stock market. For some, the notion of a hybrid approach assigning portfolio capital to each method may represent a diversified investing strategy that offers balance.